Comparison

Open Source vs Closed Source Models for Code Review in 2025

Tony Dong
July 1, 2025
15 min read
Share:
Open Source vs Closed Source Models for Code Review in 2025

The AI landscape has dramatically shifted in 2025, with powerful open source models challenging the dominance of closed source solutions. For engineering teams implementing AI code review, the choice between open and closed source models involves critical trade-offs in performance, cost, privacy, and control.

The Open Source Revolution

Models like DeepSeek R1, Qwen 2.5, and Llama 3.3 have democratized access to state-of-the-art AI capabilities. For code review specifically, these models offer compelling advantages for teams with specific requirements around data sovereignty and customization.

Performance Benchmarks

Our comprehensive testing across 1,000+ code reviews reveals surprising insights about model performance across different programming languages and complexity levels...

Cost Analysis

The economics of open source vs closed source models extend beyond simple API pricing. Infrastructure costs, maintenance overhead, and scaling considerations all factor into the total cost of ownership...

Privacy and Security Considerations

For enterprise teams handling sensitive codebases, the privacy implications of model choice can be paramount. Open source models deployed locally offer maximum data control, while closed source APIs provide convenience at the cost of data exposure...

Making the Right Choice for Your Team

The decision between open and closed source models depends on your team's specific needs, technical capabilities, and regulatory requirements. Here's our framework for making this critical decision...

Explore More

Propel LogoPROPEL

The AI Tech Lead that reviews, fixes, and guides your development team.

SOC 2 Compliant

© 2025 Propel Platform, Inc. All rights reserved.